According to the court in In re Seats, Inc., why was the trademark SEATS neither generic nor

Question:

According to the court in In re Seats, Inc., why was the trademark “SEATS” neither generic nor descriptive?

a. The term “seats” is not generic in relation to chair or couches or bleachers.

b. Seats, Inc. was selling seats in the form of tickets.

c. Competitors could still use the term “seats” in advertising.

d. “Seats” was not a common descriptive name of reservation services.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Sport Law A Managerial Approach

ISBN: 9781621590033

3rd Edition

Authors: Linda A Sharp, Anita M Moorman, Cathryn L Claussen

Question Posted: