Making use of another term of the Sommerfeld lemma (E.17), show that in the second approximation the

Question:

Making use of another term of the Sommerfeld lemma (E.17), show that in the second approximation the chemical potential of a Fermi gas at low temperatures is given by

\[\begin{equation*}\mu \simeq \varepsilon_{F}\left[1-\frac{\pi^{2}}{12}\left(\frac{k T}{\varepsilon_{F}}\right)^{2}-\frac{\pi^{4}}{80}\left(\frac{k T}{\varepsilon_{F}}\right)^{4}\right] \tag{8.1.35a}\end{equation*}\] 

and the mean energy per particle by 

\[\begin{equation*}\frac{U}{N} \simeq \frac{3}{5} \varepsilon_{F}\left[1+\frac{5 \pi^{2}}{12}\left(\frac{k T}{\varepsilon_{F}}\right)^{2}-\frac{\pi^{4}}{16}\left(\frac{k T}{\varepsilon_{F}}\right)^{4}\right] \tag{8.1.37a}\end{equation*}\]

Thence determine the \(T^{3}\)-correction to the customary \(T^{1}\)-result for the specific heat of an electron gas. Compare the magnitude of the \(T^{3}\)-term, in a typical metal such as copper, with the low-temperature specific heat arising from the Debye modes of the lattice. For further terms of these expansions, see Kiess (1987).

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Statistical Mechanics

ISBN: 9780081026922

4th Edition

Authors: R.K. Pathria, Paul D. Beale

Question Posted: