G2 Crowd provides commentary and insight about employee engagement trends and challenges within organizations in its G2 Crowd Employee Engagement Report. The report represents the results of an online survey conducted in 2019 with employees located across the United States. G2 Crowd was interested in examining differences between HR and non-HR employees. One area of focus was on employees' response to important metrics to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of employee engagement programs. The findings are summarized in the following tables.

What is the probability that a randomly chosen employee

a. Is an HR employee?

b. Is an HR employee or indicates that absenteeism is an important metric to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of employee engagement programs?

c. Does not indicate that presenteeism is an important metric to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of employee engagement programs and is a non-HR employee?

d. Does not indicate that presenteeism is an important metric to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of employee engagement programs or is a non-HR employee?

e. Suppose the randomly chosen employee does indicate that presenteeism is an important metric to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of employee engagement programs. What is the probability that the employee is a non-HR employee?

f. Are "presenteeism is an important metric" and "employee" independent?

g. Is "absenteeism is an important metric" independent of "employee"?

Transcribed Image Text:

PRESENTEEISM IS AN IMPORTANT METRIC EMPLOYEE Yes No Total HR 53 79 132 Non-HR 43 225 268 Total 96 304 400 ABSENTEEISM Is AN IMPORTANT METRIC ΕMPLOYEE Yes No Total HR 54 78 132 Non-HR 72 196 268 Total 126 274 400