Question: The application of the thin skull rule often places a considerable burden on a defendant who is found liable in negligence, above and beyond what
The application of the “thin skull” rule often places a considerable burden on a defendant who is found liable in negligence, above and beyond what would normally be “reasonably foreseeable.” Is it fair that the negligent party assume the burden of these extra costs? Does the “thin skull” rule make sense when considered alongside the rule about remoteness of damage?
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.53 Rating (167 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Absent the thin skull rule the courts would have to try what is a no... View full answer
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
Document Format (1 attachment)
690-L-B-L-T-C (374).docx
120 KBs Word File
