This case concerns statements and evidentiary rulings made by a judge during the course of a criminal trial. The judge interrupted defense counsel during the opening statements telling him to "get to what you will show." Defendant argues that this statement shifted the burden of proof from prosecutor to defense. The judge refused to allow expert testimony where an offer of proof failed to establish a proper foundation. The appellate court rejected defense arguments on these two points and refused to consider another issue that had been raised for the first time on appeal.
1. Explain the defendant's argument in this appeal.
2. Explain the court's reasoning and ultimate conclusion.