Question: We stated in Section 17.3 that MM's proof of dividend irrelevance assumes that any new shares are sold at a fair price. Consider the case

We stated in Section 17.3 that MM's proof of dividend irrelevance assumes that any new shares are sold at a fair price. Consider the case in Problem 16 in which Hewlard Pocket pays the higher dividend of $2 a share and replaces the cash by issuing new stock. Suppose that the new shares are sold in a public issue at $8 a share, which is below the market price after the $2 dividend is paid. What is the loss suffered by the existing shareholders? Is dividend policy still irrelevant? Why or why not?

Step by Step Solution

3.54 Rating (161 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

At a price of 800 the firm will need to sell 12500 shares T... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

1280-B-C-F-S(1501).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Corporate Finance Questions!