1. Why was it necessary for AAA to try to assert the long-arm statute in this case?

2. Does the court conclude that it does or does not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant? Why?

3. This opinion does not resolve the underlying dispute between the parties. Why not? What will happen next in this case?

This case arises out of the allegedly infringing use by defendants Darba Enterprises, Inc. and Darren Bagnuolo of plaintiff American Automobile Association’s (“AAA”) trademarks. AAA is a non-profit corporation that provides services and products to consumers, such as roadside assistance packages, auto insurance and health insurance. AAA has used its “famous and distinctive” AAA trademarks (the “AAA Marks”) for over 100 years, and has registered more than 70 of these marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Defendant Darba Enterprises is a corporation that operates several websites that purport to match consumers seeking auto insurance quotes with third-party insurers.