A variable that assumes an optimal value between its lower and upper bounds has a reduced cost

Question:

A variable that assumes an optimal value between its lower and upper bounds has a reduced cost value of zero. Why must this be true? (What if such a variable’s reduced cost value is not zero? What does this imply about the value of the objective function?)

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: