Question: 2. A variable that assumes an optimal value between its lower and upper bounds has a reduced cost value of zero. Why must this be

2. A variable that assumes an optimal value between its lower and upper bounds has a reduced cost value of zero. Why must this be true? (Hint: What if such a variable's reduced cost value is not zero? What does this imply about the value of the objective function?)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
