David Stark submitted an application to the maintenance department of Wyman-Gordon Co. Stark was a journeyman millwright
Question:
She informed Stark that Wyman-Gordon was a nonunion shop and asked how he felt about this. Peevler’s notes from the interview characterize Stark’s response to this question as “seems to lean toward third-party intervention.” Company officials testified that Stark’s qualifications were “exactly what we were looking for,” but he was not hired. Stark claimed that he was discriminated against. Wyman-Gordon denied that any discrimination had occurred. Is a job applicant (as opposed to an employee) entitled to protection from antiunion discrimination? On the facts of this case, has any discrimination taken place? [Wyman-Gordon Co. v NLRB, 108 LRRM 2085 (1st Cir)]
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Andersons Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-0324786668
21st Edition
Authors: David p. twomey, Marianne moody Jennings
Question Posted: