Question: Inequity aversion has been used to explain why outcomes in the ultimatum and dictator games deviate so distinctly from the selfish outcomes generally predicted in

Inequity aversion has been used to explain why outcomes in the ultimatum and dictator games deviate so distinctly from the selfish outcomes generally predicted in economic theory.
a. Derive the predictions of the inequity aversion utility function found in equation 15.1 for Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler's experiment in Example 15.4. Assume α = β = 0.5. Remember that utility is now a function of each player's monetary outcome.
b. Derive the predictions of inequity aversion in the prisoner's dilemma.
c. Often, political arguments are made in terms of inequity aversion. For example, in September 2011, thousands of protesters occupied Wall Street and other venues, protesting what they claimed was an unfair economy. Their targets were clearly those making mass amounts of money in investing. Which theories of social preferences would best describe the actions of such protesters? What might these theories say about the response by investors, investment firms, or the government?

Step by Step Solution

3.48 Rating (155 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a In this case each players utility function in the first round can be represented as In the first phase the dictator who is unaware of the second pha... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

937-B-O-B-G (1286).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Organizational Behavior Questions!