Question: Maximum-likelihood for mixtures: Let (psi_{0}(cdot), ldots, psi_{k}(cdot)) be given probability density functions on (mathbb{R}), and let [ m_{theta}(y)=theta_{0} psi_{0}(y)+cdots+theta_{k} psi_{k}(y) ] be a (k+1)-component mixture

Maximum-likelihood for mixtures: Let \(\psi_{0}(\cdot), \ldots, \psi_{k}(\cdot)\) be given probability density functions on \(\mathbb{R}\), and let

\[
m_{\theta}(y)=\theta_{0} \psi_{0}(y)+\cdots+\theta_{k} \psi_{k}(y)
\]

be a \(k+1\)-component mixture with non-negative weights adding to one. Suppose that \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) are independent and identically distributed with density \(m_{\theta}\), assumed to be strictly positive for \(\theta\) strictly positive. Under what conditions is the mixture model with independent and identically distributed observations identifiable? Show that the maximum-likelihood estimator satisfies the condition

\[
\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\psi_{r}\left(y_{i}ight)}{\hat{m}\left(y_{i}ight)} \leq n
\]

with equality for every \(r\) such that \(\hat{\theta}_{r}>0\). Discuss the 'almost-true' claim that \(\hat{m}\) exists and is unique for every \(n \geq 1\) and every \(y \in \mathbb{R}^{n}\), even if the model is not identifiable.

Step by Step Solution

3.40 Rating (159 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Applied Statistics And Probability For Engineers Questions!