Question: Consider a version of the LinkedList class of Section 16.1.8 in which the iterators hasNext method has been replaced with the following faulty version: Develop
Consider a version of the LinkedList class of Section 16.1.8 in which the iterator’s hasNext method has been replaced with the following faulty version:
![]()
Develop a program ListTest with a test case that shows the error. The program should print a failure message with this implementation but not with the correct one.
public boolean hasNext() { return position != null; }
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (158 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
It seems you have a suggested faulty hasNext implementation for an iterator of a linked list which is causing an error somewhere in its logic The given hasNext method appears to return true as long as ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
