Fraudulent Misrepresentation. In 1987, United Parcel Service Co.and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.(together known as UPS),decided to change the par cel delivery business from relying on contract carriers to establishing its own airline. During the transition, which took sixteen months, UPS hired 811 pilots. At the time, UPS expressed a desire to hire pilots who remained throughout that period with its contract carriers, which included Orion Air.A UPS representative met with more than fifty Orion pilots and made promises of future employment.John Rickert,a captain with Orion,was one of the pilots.Orion ceased operation after the UPS transi tion,and UPS did not hire Rickert,who obtained employ ment about six months later as a second officer with American Airlines,but at a lower salary.Rickert filed a suit in a Kentucky state court against UPS, claiming, in part, fraud based on the promises made by the UPS represen tative.UPS filed a motion for a directed verdict.What are the elements for a cause of action based on fraudulent misrepresentation? In whose favor should the court rule in this case,and why? [United Parcel Service,Inc.v.Rickert, 996 S.W.2d 464 (Ky.1999)]