Our constitution guarantees freedom of expression. Yet when people criticize public officials and other public figures, they can be sued for defamation, even if they believe what they say is true. Do you think we should adopt an approach similar to that in the United States and take the position that it is more important to have a frank debate with respect to such public matters, a debate free of the chill imposed by the threat of legal action? Should the protections of privileged communications be applied to all such discussions of matters of public interest, whether the statements are accurate or not? Should the media enjoy special protection in such matters? Consider the appropriateness of the new “responsible communication” defence in your discussion.