Why, according to Robinson v. California, may a person not be held criminally liable for being addicted

Question:

Why, according to Robinson v. California, may a person not be held criminally liable for being addicted to illicit narcotics? Is this decision distinguishable from Powell v. Texas?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question

Criminal Law And Procedure

ISBN: 9780495095484

6th Edition

Authors: John M Scheb, John M Scheb II

Question Posted: