Question: From data for 101 countries on per capita income in dollars (X) and life expectancy in years (Y) in the early 1970s, Sen and Srivastava
From data for 101 countries on per capita income in dollars (X) and life expectancy in years (Y) in the early 1970s, Sen and Srivastava obtained the following regression results:
Ŷi = −2.40 + 9.39 ln Xi − 3.36 [Di (ln Xi − 7)]
se = (4.73) (0.859) (2.42) R2 = 0.752
where Di = 1 if ln Xi > 7, and Di = 0 otherwise. When ln Xi = 7, X = $1,097 (approximately).
a. What might be the reason(s) for introducing the income variable in the log form?
b. How would you interpret the coefficient 9.39 of ln Xi ?
c. What might be the reason for introducing the regressor Di (ln Xi − 7)? How do you explain this regressor verbally? And how do you interpret the coefficient −3.36 of this regressor
d. Assuming per capita income of $1,097 as the dividing line between poorer and richer countries, how would you derive the regression for countries whose per capita is less than $1,097 and the regression for countries whose per capita income is greater than $1,097?
Step by Step Solution
3.31 Rating (172 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a The coefficient of the income variable in the log form is a semielasticity that is it represents t... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (2 attachments)
1529_605d88e1d3d84_656775.pdf
180 KBs PDF File
1529_605d88e1d3d84_656775.docx
120 KBs Word File
