Return to the child mortality example that we have discussed several times. In regression (7.6.2) we regressed

Question:

Return to the child mortality example that we have discussed several times. In regression (7.6.2) we regressed child mortality (CM) on per capita GNP (PGNP) and female literacy rate (FLR). Now we extend this model by including total fertility rate (TFR). The data on all these variables are already given in the following . We reproduce regression (7.6.2) and give results of the extended regression model below:

Observation CM FLFP PGNP TFR Observation CM FLFP PGNP TER 128 8640 1 37 1870 6.66 33 142 50 7.17 130 6.15 204 22 34 104



1. CM = 263.6416 – 0.0056 PGNP; – 2.2316 FLR; = (11.5932) (0.0019) (0.2099) R2 = 0.7077 2. ČM; = 168.3067 - se = (3



a. How would you interpret the coefficient of TFR? A priori, would you expect a positive or negative relationship between CM and TFR? Justify your answer.

b. Have the coefficient values of PGNP and FR changed between the two equations? If so, what may be the reason(s) for such a change? Is the observed difference statistically significant? Which test do you use and why?

c. How would you choose between models 1 and 2? Which statistical test would you use to answer this question? Show the necessary calculations.

d. We have not given the standard error of the coefficient of TFR. Can you find it out?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Basic Econometrics

ISBN: 978-0073375779

5th edition

Authors: Damodar N. Gujrati, Dawn C. Porter

Question Posted: