Repeat Examples 6 .6 and 6 .7 for the M = 1 .1 test case reported
Question:
Repeat Examples 6 .6 and 6 .7 for the M∞ = 1 .1 test case reported in Tijdeman et al. (1979b). Are the Mach box and Mach panel method predictions as good as for the M∞ = 1 .32 case? Are there any numerical instabilities as B → 0 ?
Data from Example 6.6
Calculate the oscillating pressure distribution on the wing of the F-5 aircraft pitching about the half-chord at M∞ = 1.32.
Data from Example 6.7
Repeat Example 6.6 using the Mach panel method.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Unsteady Aerodynamics Potential And Vortex Methods
ISBN: 9781119762539
1st Edition
Authors: Grigorios Dimitriadis
Question Posted: