Despite the Montreal Protocol, the nation of Livy continues to produce CFC-emitting refrigerators and to export them to nations throughout the world. A number of governments object to Livy’s practices and ban its exports pursuant to the protocol. Livy brings an action under GATT, alleging that under the principles stated in the Shrimp case, this is an attempt to impose conservationist policies on Livy. How should the GATT panel rule?