Identify and explain the fallacies of relevance or defective induction, or presumption, or ambiguity as they occur in the following passages. Explain why, in the case of some, it may be plausibly argued that what appears at first to be a fallacy is not, when the argument is interpreted correctly.

. . . Since it is impossible for an animal or plant to be indefinitely big or small, neither can its parts be such, or the whole will be the same.

—Aristotle, Physics