Blubaugh, a farmer, leased a combine from John Deere Leasing (JDL). The lease document was preprinted on two sides of the paper, but one side was printed in very small, light type and could not be altered. Blubaugh read and signed the front side but did not notice or read the other side of the document. It contained unusual provisions making Blubaugh liable in the event of breach for much more money than the unpaid lease payments. When Blubaugh breached, JDL sued. The trial judge required a magnifying glass to read the fine print. Is the lease contract unconscionable? Why or why not? (John Deere Leasing Company v. Blubaugh, 636 F. Supp. 1569, Kan.)