1. A report indicates that the results of an independent investigation by the consulting firm Arthur d. little point to sabotage as the cause of the gas leak. Do you think that was possible given the facts of the case? Why or why not?

2. Because Arthur d. little was hired for $700,000 by Union Carbide to investigate the incident, do you consider it to be an independent investigation? Why or why not?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 A report indicates that the results of an independent investigation by the consulting firm Arthur d little point to sabotage as the cause of the gas ... View the full answer