$(10$ points$)$: Name and describe at least two cases used as precedent by the Court in their majority opinion. How did the Court use the case precedent to support its argument?

$(10$ points$)$: The Court states in the majority opinion in Section B: $$Ultimately$,$ the employers are forced to abandon the statutory text and precedent altogether and appeal to assumptions and policy. Most pointedly, they contend that few in $1964$ would have expected Title VII to apply to discrimination against homosexual and transgender persons. And whatever the text and our precedent indicate, they say, shouldn$$t this fact cause us to pause before recognizing liability?$$ The Court then goes on to respond to the question in the last sentence. Briefly summarize how the Court responds.