1) A) Most criminal convictions require that prosecutors prove that the defendant committed a voluntary act that resulted in a social harm. In McClain v. State, the Supreme Court of Indiana considered whether Mr. McClains convictions of battery against police officers (among other crimes) should be overturned because he hadnt been given a fair opportunity to show that no voluntary act (actus reus) had taken place. How, exactly, did Mr. McClain seek to make his argument and how did the court rule? Minimum 200 words.

B) Did the court make the right decision in McClain v. State? Explain.

C) Make the best case you can that the court shouldve upheld Mr. McClains conviction.