Question: 15. What is the difference between contributory negligence and comparative negligence? Group of answer choices There is no difference In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff
15. What is the difference between contributory negligence and comparative negligence?
Group of answer choices
There is no difference
In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiff receives no award; in comparative negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiffs award is reduced by the extent to which the plaintiff is found to be at fault
In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is greater than 50% liable, the plaintiff receives no award; in comparative negligence, if a plaintiff greater than 51% liable, the plaintiff receives no award
In contributory negligence, the plaintiff must prove all of the elements of negligence; in comparative negligence, the plaintiff does not have to prove duty, breach or proximate causation
In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiffs award is reduced by the extent to which the plaintiff is found at fault; in comparative negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiff receives no award
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
