Question: 15. What is the difference between contributory negligence and comparative negligence? Group of answer choices There is no difference In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff

15. What is the difference between contributory negligence and comparative negligence?

Group of answer choices

There is no difference

In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiff receives no award; in comparative negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiffs award is reduced by the extent to which the plaintiff is found to be at fault

In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is greater than 50% liable, the plaintiff receives no award; in comparative negligence, if a plaintiff greater than 51% liable, the plaintiff receives no award

In contributory negligence, the plaintiff must prove all of the elements of negligence; in comparative negligence, the plaintiff does not have to prove duty, breach or proximate causation

In contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiffs award is reduced by the extent to which the plaintiff is found at fault; in comparative negligence, if a plaintiff is at all at fault, the plaintiff receives no award

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!