$2)$Engineer A$,$ a licensed electrical engineer, works for a state university on construction and renovation projects. Engineer As immediate manager is an architect, and next in the chain of command is an administrator $($Administrator$),$ a man with no technical background. Administrator, without talking to the engineers, often produces project cost estimates that Administrator passes on to higher university officials. In cases where it becomes evident that actual costs are going to exceed these estimates, Administrator pressures the engineers to reduce design features. One such occasion involves the renovation of a warehouse to convert storage space into office space. Among the specifications detailed by Engineer A is the installation of emergency exit lights. These are mandated by the building code. As part of his effort to bring down actual costs, Administrator insists that the specification for emergency lights be deleted. Engineer A strongly objects and when Engineer A refuses to yield, Administrator accuses Engineer A of being a disruptive influence in the workplace. Conduct an ethical analysis in this case and finally come up with an ethical outcome of this case. $($Discuss one applicable NSPE code$)$