4. Scenario D: Post-development conditions/ Transient Your model in Scenario C has been reviewed by EPA and it suggested that your model is not accurate because you assumed a constant average long daily recharge rate. Historical records of water table fluctuation in this valley suggest that the water table rises 2 m each year in early spring and then declines over the rest of the year to low in September Estimated monthly average recharge rates are given in Table 1. Rerun Scenario with the monthly recharge rates instead of long-term average recharge rate. Compare Scenario D with C. Discuss any impacts on the mass balance and flow regime. Draw the water-table profile in a north-south cross section and label the simulated groundwater divide between the river and wetland. Compute the discharge to the river and wetland Adapted from Problem 4.1 & 7.1 in Anderson, M.P. and W. W. Woessner, Applied Groundwater Modeling, Academic Press, 1992 4. Scenario D: Post-development conditions/ Transient Your model in Scenario C has been reviewed by EPA and it suggested that your model is not accurate because you assumed a constant average long daily recharge rate. Historical records of water table fluctuation in this valley suggest that the water table rises 2 m each year in early spring and then declines over the rest of the year to low in September Estimated monthly average recharge rates are given in Table 1. Rerun Scenario with the monthly recharge rates instead of long-term average recharge rate. Compare Scenario D with C. Discuss any impacts on the mass balance and flow regime. Draw the water-table profile in a north-south cross section and label the simulated groundwater divide between the river and wetland. Compute the discharge to the river and wetland Adapted from Problem 4.1 & 7.1 in Anderson, M.P. and W. W. Woessner, Applied Groundwater Modeling, Academic Press, 1992