69. Jane Erroll has applied for a position with Lakes Distribution Company. When Jane arrives for her interview she is asked several questions about events and photos that were posted on her Facebook page. Jane has an open setting on her Facebook page so that it is publicly available. Jane apparently did not provide sufficient explanations for what was posted on her Facebook page and does not get the job despite being qualified for the position. Which of the following statements is correct about Janes experience?

A		The employers conduct violated federal law.
B		As long as the employer looked at all the job candidates Facebook pages, the employer has not violated any federal laws.
C		Jane must give her consent before the employer can look at her Facebook page.
D		The employer has violated the Stored Communications Act.

70.IFRACK is the user name of an individual who has been posting his opinion about fracking on blogs, in chat rooms, and in cyber letters to newspapers. Several environmental groups wish to stop the comments IFRACK makes, since they believe that IFRACK may be affiliated with the oil industry, and believe that information should be disclosed. Which of the following is correct in analyzing this situation?

A		The environmental groups will be able to obtain IFRACKs identity from the ISP because they have a good reason to believe he or she may be affiliated with the oil industry.
B		The environmental groups are not entitled to know IFRACKs identity because of First Amendment protections.
C		There is never identity disclosure allowed in civil matters.
D		Since the environmental group believes that a failure to disclose an affiliation to the oil industry is illegal; the ISP must disclose IFRAC's identity.

76.Sprago, a fine restaurant, has hired only male waiters over the past ten years. Sprago's manager says male waiters look more professional and customers prefer male waiters to female waiters. A female, who is 7 months pregnant, and who has applied for and been denied a waiter position at Sprago in spite of her qualifications would have:

A		no cause of action since being male is a BFOQ.
B		no cause of action unless females were denied other positions in the restaurant.
C		a cause of action for sex discrimination under Title VII.
D		no cause of action, since she was pregnant and could only work for a month or two