8) Sally, a U.S. citizen, was employed by Kev Electronics Inc., a U.S. corporation. She w at a facility based in London. During a recent workforce reduction, Sally was terminated from her job. She noticed that only female employees were laid off. She contacted the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to file a discrimination claim. In the context of employees covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which of the following is true? A) Sally's claim will not be investigated by the EEOC as is the facility was based in London. t of federal fandr B) Sally's claim cannot be filed with the EEOC because the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is in charge of employment discrimination against non-U.S. citizens. c) Sally's claim cannot be filed with the EEOC because she is not a U.S. citizen and she does not live in the United States. D) Sally has the right to file a discrimination claim against her former employer pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

8) Sally, a U.S. citizen, was employed by Kev Electronics Inc., a U.S. corporation. at a facility based in London. During a recent workforce reduction, Sally was terminated from her job. She noticed that only female employees were laid off. She contacted the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to file a discrimination claim. In the context of employees covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which of the following is true? A) Sally's claim will not be investigated by the EEOC as is the facility was based in London. B) Sally's claim cannot be filed with the EEOC because the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is in charge of employment discrimination against non-U.S. citizens. C) Sally's claim cannot be filed with the EEOC because she is not a U.S. citizen and she does not live in the United States. D) Sally has the right to file a discrimination claim against her former employer pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1991