Question: A soil sample was tested to have LL = 3 0 % and PL = 2 5 % . Sieve analysis showed the percentage retained

A soil sample was tested to have LL =30% and PL =25%. Sieve analysis showed the percentage retained on 4.75 mm sieve was 90%. Considering the Gs =2.68, find the maximum dry density and corresponding optimum moisture content using both Gurtug and Sridharan (2004)s method and Omar et.al.(2003)s method. Discuss the difference found in the results using two methods. Assume, the compaction was done by modified Proctor compaction equipment

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Civil Engineering Questions!

Q:

Hi, could you please help me solve this? Thank you so much. Chester, Inc. Trial Balances for years ending December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015 Account Description Cash on Hand Regular Checking Account...

Q:

In this example, the particle size distribution for a soil is determined using sieve analysis. The data is reported in the table below, please calculate the total mass of sample analyzed (sum of all...

Q:

Question # 3 ( 3 pts . ) : It has been anticipated that the soil under the proposed slab portion in Question # 2 is contaminated, and needs to be removed and backfilled to a depth of 3 feet. A 0 . 7...

Q:

In the attached article: What concerns are related to the article in reference to validity and reliability faced ? Were steps taken to ensure validity and reliability? Culturally Competent...

Q:

Question Three The sieve analysis of a soil revealed that 6 5 % of the soil sample tested was retained on No . 4 Sieve and 3 0 % retained on No . 2 0 0 Sieve. The liquid limit and plastic limit of...

Q:

A dried soil was subjected to particle size analysis with the following results Sieve (mm) Mass Retained (g) 60.000 31.35 6.000 14.4 2.000 12.4 0.600 12.0 0.063 16.5 Pan 7.4 Determine the percentage...

Q:

Explain how to solve Fore group 6 only all thus question please Date: March 5 , 2 0 2 4 Due Date: March 1 7 , 2 0 2 3 Q . 1 . A sieve analysis of a soil sample was carried out in the laboratory and...

Q:

Results of a sieve analysis for Soils A, B, and C are given below. To obtain a more representative sample for further geotechnical testing, a ternary blend was created by uniformly mixing 8000 kg of...

Q:

In the attached article please Briefly describe the methodology used. Was the methodology appropriate? Why or why not? Could the author answer the question with the selected method? How did you make...

Q:

B) Calculate the cumulative percent retained and cumulative percentage passing of the following: (15 Marks) Cumulative Wt. Cumulative percent Cumulative percentage retained (g) retained (g) passing...

Q:

Required: Provide at least three possible explanations for Momentum's alpha found for the Fama- French 3-factor model. The following information is obtained from historical data and pertains to all...

Q:

In conducting triaxial test to determine shear strengths for soil samples, what consolidation pressures should be specified?

Q:

1 1 1 Required information Part 1 of 1 5 [ The following information applies to the questions displayed below ] Oslo Company prepared the following contribution format income statement based on a...

Q:

Evergreen Corporation (calendar year-end) acquired the following assets during the current year: (Use MACRS Table 1 and Table 2) Asset Date Placed in Service October 25 Original Basis Machinery...