Question: According to the final decision in the Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals case, which of the following is true in regard to NFL games? a. Intentional
- According to the final decision in the Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals case, which of the following is true in regard to NFL games?
|
| a. | Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game that violates the rules of the game is a tort. | |
| b. | Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game may be subject to civil liability laws depending upon the individual circumstances. | ||
|
| c. | Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game violates the rules of the game and is a crime. | |
| d. | Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game is never subject to review by the courts, but is rather a risk inherent in the sport.
|
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
