1. According to the final decision in the Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals case, which of the following is true in regard to NFL games?

	a.	Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game that violates the rules of the game is a tort.
	b.	Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game is never subject to review by the courts, but is rather a risk inherent in the sport.
	c.	Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game violates the rules of the game and is a crime.
	d.	Intentional striking of a player by another player during the course of a game may be subject to civil liability laws depending upon the individual circumstances.