Amy and Barry, while working for the Red Cross, committed a when they violated a duty imposed on them by law. Because they committed the wrongful act together, they were joint but because they could be sued separately, their liability was rather than Because the doctrine of no longer applies, the Red Cross, which is the of Amy and Barry, has liability for the torts of its under the doctrine of If it turns out that Amy is required to pay more than Barry for the damages they caused, Amy has the right of to recover the excess from Barry. This case is not one involving the doctrine of because it does not involve a governmental body being from tort liability, nor does it involve a(n) . or -that is, a person who authorizes another to act or one who is