Question: Answer this question using the information below. your answer should be short and effective (one paragraph should be fine), and type your answer please!! QUESTION:

Answer this question using the information below. your answer should be short and effective (one paragraph should be fine), and type your answer please!!

QUESTION: You Be the Judge: Was the professors syllabus an offer whose acceptance formed an enforceable contract?

Facts: Matthew Gabriel was a student in Professor Pumos immunology class. Professor Pumos syllabus outlined course requirements and stated that plagiarism will not be tolerated. After grading the first assignment, Professor Pumo realized that many papers had sentences copied from other sources without citations. Instead of reporting everyone for plagiarism, Professor Pumo said she would give students a free pass on one copied sentence. But Gabriels paper contained many plagiarized sentences, so he received a failing grade for the assignment. Gabriel sued the professor for breach of contract. He argued that the syllabus was a contract and that the free pass policy broke itbecause that term was not part of their original agreement. According to Gabriel, since the professor breached the contract, he was no longer obligated to refrain from plagiarizing, and so should not be punished.

Argument for Gabriel: A syllabus is a contract. On the first day of class, the professor presents the syllabus as an offer and students agree by staying in the course. Who has not chosen a class because of its particular workload or assignments? The terms in the syllabus are promises upon which students rely. Professor Pumo unilaterally changed the written rules of the game. Once she broke her promise, there was no longer a deal. Students should not be held to her arbitrary rules.

Argument for Professor: Professors do not intend to make an offer when they hand out a syllabusmuch less be legally bound! The syllabus is merely an announcement that provides general information about course requirements, grading policies, and behavior guidelines. Reasonable people do not expect a syllabus to be enforceable in court. It was not a contractProfessor Pumo had the right to change the class rules, make additional assignments, or even kick Gabriel out at any time. Even if the syllabus were a contract, the phrase plagiarism will not be tolerated is too indefinite to be a valid offer. Gabriel is not immune from the plagiarism rules.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!