Apply It: Product Liability

Total points: $--/100$

Attempts left: $1$

To prove a design defect, Hall must prove:

There was a safer alternative $-$ design

The decision of the manufacturer to not adopt the design was select answer

According to the witness for the company, there

was not a reasonable alternative design for the cleaner. If there is no alternative design for the product, most courts will engage in a

select answer of the product. In this case, the court agreed with the company witnesses that the select answer outweigh the

select answer If there is no way to reasonably prevent the harm through a safer design, then the manufacturer:

select answer $.$ According to the court, this product

select answer defective because of the design.

Hall also claimed the product had inadequate warnings. The risk of a backsplash when using this product to clear a drain

select answer obvious. The company

select answer required to put a warning or instruction about any non$-$obvious risk. The company selectanswer include instructions to prevent or reduce the risk of harm from backsplash.

The instructions on the cleaner

select answer

clear with respect to the potential for backsplash and select answer adequate instructions. Given the warnings on the labels, the product select answer dangerous beyond the expectation of an