assigned sections from Chapters 1 and 2 in your textbook With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Updated ed.). The University of Arizona Global Campus and review the following videos: What is an Argument? Identifying Premises and Conclusions What is a Good Argument? (Part I) What is a Good Argument?: The Logic Condition Standard Form In the Standard Form Arguments discussion this week, you selected the topic you will address in your papers for this course. In this first paper, you will find two articles in popular (non-scholarly) sources that address your topic from opposing perspectives. You will present and evaluate their reasoning. For an example paper, look at the Week One Example Paper and download it. First, find two popular (non-scholarly) sources that argue for opposing positions on your topic. [Guidance on finding popular sources]. Then, move on to creating your written paper. Your paper should include the following clearly labeled sections: Provide an introduction to your topic (approximately 100 words): State your topic and briefly explain why you chose it (e.g., why it is important to you). Explain the first popular source (approximately 75 words): Describe the source (and include a link). Briefly evaluate the source, addressing questions such as: Does the source address the argument fairly or is it one-sided? Does the source present clear and direct reasoning? Does the source use language that could bias the reader to one side or the other? Present the argument from first source in standard form (approximately 75 words): In standard form, the premises are listed, one by one, above the conclusion. Each premise/conclusion is one declarative sentence. See the sample paper for an example. Evaluate the quality of the reasoning in the first source (approximately 200 words). Address questions such as: Do the premises seem to be well supported? Do the premises adequately support the truth of the conclusion? Are there any errors (as far as you can tell) in the argument? What (if any) missing premises could be added to strengthen the argument? How might someone with a different point of view reply to the argument? Explain the second popular source (same instructions as for the first source above). Present the argument from the second source in standard form (same instructions as for the first source above). Evaluate the quality of the reasoning in the second source (same instructions as for the first source above). Provide a brief conclusion (approximately 100 words). Address these questions: How might a responsible and logical person go about finding the best reasoning on this topic? What can we do to overcome our biases in order to be more fair and objective when addressing questions lik