ASSIGNMENT: As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given the two articles linked below that present opposing sides of an issue $($mandatory uniforms in schools vs$.$ some kind of $$dress code$),$ construct your own $2-3$ page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a concrete, workable solution or "middle ground."

The essay should contain the following components:

$1.$ An introduction that accurately presents both sources $($i$.$e$.,$ author, title, year of publication, and their relative position in the debate$),$ as well as your middle ground thesis statement.

$2.$ A body paragraph that summarizes the pro$-$uniform rationales. $($Both articles can be used, but focus on Anderson$).$

$3.$ A body paragraph that summarizes the anti$-$uniform$/$pro$-$dress code rationales. $($Both articles can be used, but focus on Deane$).$

$4.$ A body paragraph that critically compares and contrasts both sides of the debate.

$5.$ A conclusion that further develops your proposed middle$-$ground solution and demonstrates how it satisfies both sides of the debate.

Article $1$: "School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies"

Article $2$: "Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms"