Based on the data in the table, calculate the indicators of accounting for the number and productivity of staff and compare 5 companies. Who is less effective? Who is the leading one?

	Average number of employees, persons	Cost of manufactured products, thousand $	The level of defects,%	Number of dismissed employees, persons	Number of highly qualified personnel, persons	Administrative staff, persons	The main production workers, persons
1	136	3176	3	7	75	21	90
2	214	4630	5	6	112	34	103
3	32	2786	2	2	18	8	17
4	57	4122	3	4	26	19	28
5	12	2150	2	1	6	2	5

Table for answers

	Rate 1	Rate 2
1
2
3
4
5

Determine whether the company has significant personnel policy problems, taking into account the category and number of dismissed employees (Table 3) and the relevant norms (Table 4)

3.

	Category and number of dismissed employees
1	1 administrative, 4 highly qualified
2	2 administrative, 3 highly qualified
3	2 not qualified
4	3 not qualified, 1 administrative
5	1 administrative

4.

Type of Personnel	Average normal staff turnover,%
Not qualified	30-50
With low qualification	15-30
Highly qualified	5-10
Middle managers	5
Senior managers	0-2

Compare 5 companies in terms of staff efficiency, calculating a comprehensive indicator that takes into account several criteria of efficiency and the level of their importance:

1) staff structure (S-criterion)

2) staff turnover (T-criterion)

3) the level of productivity (P-criterion)

4) quality of work (D-criterion).

Use a complex indicator and weight rates.