Based upon the information below, does this show a significant correlation? (Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)?

I believe it does not, but am unsure of the reasoning?

The researcher's question of correlation between the cost of beer and the number of calories it contains:

The Pearson correlation indicated is 0.214,

r = 0.214, n= 35, p = 0.216

The researcher's question of correlation between the cost of beer and the volume of alcohol it contains:

The Pearson correlation indicated is 0.199, this is

r = 0.199, n= 35, p = 0.252

Correlations

Cost per 12 Fluid Ounces for brand

Calories per 12 Fluid Ounces for brand

Alcohol by Volume (in %) for brand

Cost per 12 Fluid Ounces for brand

Pearson Correlation

1

.214

.199

Sig. (2-tailed)

.216

.252

N

35

35

35

Calories per 12 Fluid Ounces for brand

Pearson Correlation

.214

1

.839^**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.216

.000

N

35

35

35

Alcohol by Volume (in %) for brand

Pearson Correlation

.199

.839^**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.252

.000

N

35

35

35

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).