Benjamin is at a protest when he faces an opposing protest. Benjamin yells, "Don't let those bloody, criminal, un$-$American jerks step on your rights, no matter what! We stay; they leave!" The police try to make Benjamin's group back up$.$ Benjamin's group of protesters charges the other group and the police. Unfortunately, Benjamin's gup injures three people, including a police officer. Benjamin is indicted for inciting a riot. Benjamin argues that he was exercising his right to free speech. Two of the state's witnesses, who were members of Benjamin's group, testified that they would not have participated in the riot without Benjamin's call to action. Concerning this case against Benjamin, here is the most likely result:Courses The jury will return a verdict of not guilty, because the right to protest, especially if it is about matters of "politics," is nearly$23$Groupsabsolute. The jury will return a verdict of not guilty, because, even if Benjamin's speech was hateful and inspired his followers to act violently, Benjamin has the right to free speech as long as he $($Benjamin$)$ himself did not personally take part in acts of violence.Calendar The jury will return a verdict of guilty, because Benjamin's language was defamatory.Inbox The jury will return a verdict of guilty because Benjamin's speech is obscene.History The jury could return a verdict of guilty, decide that Benjamin is not guilty, or simply be unable to reach a verdict; certainly, the First Amendment's free speech provision does not protect all speech, but $-$ on the other hand $-$ even strong language does not necessarily mean that a speaker is responsible for how individuals react to his speech.