Bo breaks into Derek's home one night. While he was prowling in the kitchen, he slips on a banana peel and cracks his skull. Bo sues Derek for negligence. Please briefly explain the reason that Derek will not be liable for negligence to Bo.

Thomas is injured in an accident caused primarily by the negligence of Bob. Thomas suffers $100,000 worth of harm. Bob is 70% to blame, Thomas 30%. How much will Thomas recover from Bob under the rules of a state that has adopted comparative fault?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Dereks Lack of Duty and Causation In the scenario described Derek will likely not be liable for negl... View the full answer