Can anyone help me answer part one please!!!!!!

Part I:

Verify your technique choices with me via email, text, phone, or virtual meeting.

• List the techniques you believe are correct for each question in the body of an email
• Include your thoughts for why you think this is correct. Thinking that through and explaining it will help you work it through.

Use the names of techniques from the flow charts in the modules. You do not need to worry about symbols here (you do for the exam)as long as I can tell what you mean: For example: T-test of mu; estimator of mu1-mu2 (equal or unequal variances determined by F-test); chisq test of sigma sqd. This simple format would be perfect!

1a -technique choice, explanation

1b...

1c...

etc

Please feel free to ask anyquestions. I will answer what I can or guide you in finding the answer.

Once we have nailed them down,to receive credit, paste in or attach the last email text in place of all these instructions for credit! (I only need the last one .. not the entire stream!)

Part 2:

Following are two problem Scenarios. Be sure to carefully follow the instructions for each scenario. There are four problems for each scenario. These are separate research questions and should be considered individually. Although each scenario involves two populations, the individual questions may not be considering both. All inferential tests from both chapters 12 and 13 are possible. Also, although all data collected is interval, it is possible that you may need to come up with a nominal variable to answer a question, so consider the wording carefully. And verify your choices with me as required in part 1! This is part of the learning!!

Problem Scenario 1:

Following is a problem description. Use the mean & variance provided to answer the questions which follow, showing all calculations BY HAND. For all hypothesis tests, you MUST show all 7 steps we have been using and use the CRITICAL VALUE METHOD to make your decision.Treat each question as a separate problem -- we use the same data set but are answering different "research questions".

Irradiation of Food

The irradiation of food to destroy bacteria is a growing phenomenon. In order to determine which one of two methods of irradiation is best; a scientist took a random sample of 100 one- pound packages of minced meat and subjected 50 of them to irradiation Method 1 and the remaining 50 to irradiation Method 2. The bacteria count was measured and the following statistics were computed.The scientist noted that the data are normally distributed.

NOTE: use ONLY the Critical Value method for hypothesis tests. If you include both rules in step 4 or include both in your decision step, I will have to conclude that you do not yet understand them.