Consider a byte-addressable direct-mapped cache with 4 8-byte blocks. Determine the cache hit/miss of each access...

Transcribed Image Text:

Consider a byte-addressable direct-mapped cache with 4 8-byte blocks. Determine the cache hit/miss of each access in the table. A. Explain compulsory miss, conflict miss, and capacity miss, miss rate, and miss penalty. B. For those accesses that hit, explain whether it is due to spatial locality or temporal locality in the Reason column. For those accesses that miss, explain miss type (compulsory, conflict, or capacity) in the Reason Column. Address (Binary) 000000 010101 111111 010000 011111 000100 111111 110111 000111 111111 011100 Hit/Miss Reason C. If we change the direct-mapped cache to a 2-way set associative mapping setup, will the cache hit/miss be changed for the same access pattern? If so, please reason each cache hit/miss for the new cache organization. Address (Binary) 000000 010101 111111 010000 011111 000100 111111 110111 000111 111111 011100 Hit/Miss Reason Consider a byte-addressable direct-mapped cache with 4 8-byte blocks. Determine the cache hit/miss of each access in the table. A. Explain compulsory miss, conflict miss, and capacity miss, miss rate, and miss penalty. B. For those accesses that hit, explain whether it is due to spatial locality or temporal locality in the Reason column. For those accesses that miss, explain miss type (compulsory, conflict, or capacity) in the Reason Column. Address (Binary) 000000 010101 111111 010000 011111 000100 111111 110111 000111 111111 011100 Hit/Miss Reason C. If we change the direct-mapped cache to a 2-way set associative mapping setup, will the cache hit/miss be changed for the same access pattern? If so, please reason each cache hit/miss for the new cache organization. Address (Binary) 000000 010101 111111 010000 011111 000100 111111 110111 000111 111111 011100 Hit/Miss Reason

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

A Explanation of compulsory miss conflict miss and capacity miss miss rate and miss penalty Compulsory miss This type of miss occurs when a block is accessed for the first time It is unavoidable since ... View the full answer