Develop a discussion which includes the following: Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion: (IRAC Method) from the case shown below:

Price vs. High Pointe Oil Company Price v. High Pointe Oil Company, Inc. In 2006, Beckie Price replaced the oil furnace in her house with a propane furnace. The oil furnace was removed, but the pipe that had been used to fill the furnace with oil remained in place. At the time the furnace was replaced, Price canceled her contract for oil refills with the predecessor of High Pointe Oil Company, the defendant. Somehow, though, in November 2007, High Pointe mistakenly placed Prices address back on its keep full list. Subsequently, a High Pointe truck driver pumped around 400 gallons of fuel oil into Prices basement through the oil-fill pipe before realizing the mistake. Prices house and her belongings were destroyed. The house was eventually torn down, the site was remediated, and a new house was built on a different part of Prices property. Prices personal property was all cleaned or replaced. All of her costs related to her temporary homelessness were reimbursed to her, as well. Thus, she was fully compensated for all of her economic losses resulting from High Pointes error. Nevertheless, Price sued High Pointe alleging a number of claims. The only of her claims to survive to trial was one focused on her noneconomic lossesfor example, pain and suffering, humiliation, embarrassment, and emotional distress. A jury found in Prices favor and awarded her $100,000 in damages. High Pointe filed an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, to no avail. High Pointe then appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court.