Discussion Question 1. In your text case 6-2 Lee V Young Life the plaintiffs were the parents of a student, H.L., a Korean citizen who was an high school exchange student in Idaho who was given permission to attend a one week summer camp in British Columbia, Canada, where he drowned. Young Life, the defendant, operated the camp as a Texas Corporation headquartered in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Young Blood moves to dismiss the case due to forum non conveniens. What did the court decide with regard to this motion and what were the courts reasons. Do you think this is a fair decision for the plaintiffs? State your reasons for your position, How will this decision effect the plaintiffs compensation for their injuries? Chapter 7 LO3 Recognize who can be held liable for a crime committed to benefit a corporation.

Discussion Question 2. In United States v Decoster , case 7-2 in chapter 7, Do you agree with the holding in this case that a corporate executive can be criminally liable for failing to ensure a company's compliance with the law? State the reasons for your position. How could the business climate be different if there was not personal liability for corporate executives?