Do you find justification in the majority opinion for this decision? Do you find any merit in the dissent opinion? Do you agree or disagree with the reading by John Ragosta that "The court's decision, though, invites continued litigation: Nondiscrimination, coercion, and the question of mandatory attendance and penalties will continue to cause disputes." Decide which opinion (majority or dissent) you find most compelling and say why--that is, give reasons and evidence for your opinion