E E Dhrn the way this data was celected, is it ianty to be representative sumple of people from each state? faplan why er why hot. The Centre for Independent Studies published a paper titled "Attitudes to a post- COVID Australia" which amaliysed the responses to a series of phane polls (one in each state) conducted by YouGov on individuals over the age of 18 . A pre-specifed number of individuaks were sampled from each state. Participants were asked whether they thought their state government should have the right to refuse to allow unvaccinated people to enter their state. The results are provided in the table below broken down by state for each of the larger states (participants from smaller states and territories have been excluded). yougov x janitor:tabyl(Opinion, State) x % janitor::adorn_totols(where = c("row", col")) 9ss knitr:\{kable yougor 0%% ggplot )+aes(x= State, fill = Opinton )+ georlbar(position = "fil1") + scale_color_brewer(palette - "Set1")+ lobs (y=-Proportion") + themedinedran() table(yougov) 8 : chisq.test(simutate. p, value = ThUE) agh H" Pearson's Chi-squared test mith simulated p-value HA (bosedion 2000 replicates) deta: se X-squared =16.812, if =NA,p-value =9.02899 Given the way this data was collected, is it likely to be representative sample of people from each state? Explain why or why not. E E Dhrn the way this data was celected, is it ianty to be representative sumple of people from each state? faplan why er why hot. The Centre for Independent Studies published a paper titled "Attitudes to a post- COVID Australia" which amaliysed the responses to a series of phane polls (one in each state) conducted by YouGov on individuals over the age of 18 . A pre-specifed number of individuaks were sampled from each state. Participants were asked whether they thought their state government should have the right to refuse to allow unvaccinated people to enter their state. The results are provided in the table below broken down by state for each of the larger states (participants from smaller states and territories have been excluded). yougov x janitor:tabyl(Opinion, State) x % janitor::adorn_totols(where = c("row", col")) 9ss knitr:\{kable yougor 0%% ggplot )+aes(x= State, fill = Opinton )+ georlbar(position = "fil1") + scale_color_brewer(palette - "Set1")+ lobs (y=-Proportion") + themedinedran() table(yougov) 8 : chisq.test(simutate. p, value = ThUE) agh H" Pearson's Chi-squared test mith simulated p-value HA (bosedion 2000 replicates) deta: se X-squared =16.812, if =NA,p-value =9.02899 Given the way this data was collected, is it likely to be representative sample of people from each state? Explain why or why not