Economics Question????

Write a response, For this class, substantive means that your message has substance and promotes meaningful discussion of course content. Substantive messages will often include contributions of additional ideas and sources, insights or questions about classmates comments, connections to the course readings, ways of applying the lessons from the course, etc.Short comments, such as "Good idea" or "I agree," do not constitute substantive posts on their own. Neither do comments that are unrelated to the topics at hand (for example, I saw that movie, too!) If you say you agree about something, please explain why you agree, and add an additional insight or question.Tips for Creating Substantive Participation Posts.Explain why you agree or disagree, and add some examples to support your belief.Relate your personal or work experiences to the topic at hand.Ask additional questions of your classmates.Make connections between the topics at hand and the readings in the text.Add ways you can apply the lessons from the class in your work and educational lifeEdward Snowden is a U.S. computer scientist, former CIA employee, and former contractor for the U.S. government. Snowden is infamously known for leaking confidential government documents to the press that discuss the existence of government surveillance programs without authorization in 2013. Many legal powers believe that Snowden violated the Espionage Act of 1917, which prohibits obtaining information, recording, taking pictures, or copying records of any information involved with the national defense with intent to bring upon disturbance or harm to our nation (mtsu.eduLinks to an external site.). In this manner, Snowden's leaking of these documents was looked at by the U.S. government as an act of treason. On his behalf, Snowden argued that the reason for his "whistleblowing" was that he felt a moral obligation to inform the general public of the U.S. government's privacy violations (businessinsider.comLinks to an external site.).Although some might disagree and say that Edward Snowden is a traitor because of the way he chose to leak the information, I think that Snowden is a patriot for the U.S. public. I understand that some might be concerned with how generally "easy" it was for classified and important CIA documents to be leaked by an employee. However, if there is any unannounced violation of privacy committed by the government, the U.S. public should be informed. Snowden stated that it was his moral obligation "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them," which I agree with (theguardian.comLinks to an external site.).One of the debates about this event was that people in favor of data collection meant increased security while those opposing view it as a violation of the constitution and bill of rights. Snowden did a service for this nation and all in the name of the public good, regardless of the laws he chose to break. Simultaneously, I agree that some government data collection is reasonable and protects our people, but they should have made it public knowledge. Maybe it could have acted as a deterrent for any terrorist attacks that happened when the programs were not of general knowledge. Snowden taught us that the government keeps phone records and uses PRISM, making servers of Google, Apple, and more accessible to officials, and that they have access to our text messages. Overall, I can say that Snowden did the right thing and had good intentions of letting the public know that whatever they do is collected and can be used against them.