Effective peer responses will include one or more of the following: Suggestions or strategies for your peers to try, relating to the topics they identified as being difficult. Clarification or extension of a peer's post, beyond simple agreement (i.e., "Yes, I agree" is not an effective response) Examples of sentences/translations that may help explain the use or purpose of truth tables What I found difficult about transitioning from working with truth tables for statements to working with truth tables for arguments is knowing how to separate each variable and operation to place the Ts and Fs under. I think the most difficult aspect of this transition is that we can use the same variables across different premises and deciding how many times they can be repeated is challenging or is there a limit that can be duplicated. Overall, I think the truth tables seem somewhat easy to understand especially when it comes to knowing if an argument is valid or not, I think I am just struggling a bit with the translation of WFF